Method Acting vs Meisner Technique: Which is Better?

DISCLOSURE: AS AN AMAZON ASSOCIATE I EARN FROM QUALIFYING PURCHASES. READ THE FULL DISCLOSURE FOR MORE INFO. ALL AFFILIATE LINKS ARE MARKED #ad

In the performing arts world, two prominent techniques, Method Acting and the Meisner Technique, have shaped countless performances.

This article will analyze both methodologies in-depth, comparing their unique strengths and shared characteristics.

If you want to explore these techniques in even more depth than this article explains, I recommend you check out the article best books on acting – especially Sandford Meisner on Acting and The Method: How the Twentieth Century Learned to Act.

Method Acting Explained

Method acting (often called “the Method”) is an influential technique in theatre and film.

It is rooted in the work of Lee Strasberg and Elia Kazan, who were influenced by the acting approach system developed by Konstantin Stanislavsky in the 1930s.

Strasberg adapted this art style to fit acting in the United States. He then went on to open his theatre company and popularize this artwork.

Together with Harold Clurman and Cheryl Crawford, an actor and theatre director, he went on to open the Group Theatre theatrical collective in 1931. They polished the Method technique and added American cultural norms to make it more beneficial to actors locally.

Method acting is a psychological approach to acting that allows an actor to bring a character to life fully.

Always stay in-character

Actors who use this acting method live this character’s life physically, mentally, and emotionally. 

They respond, think, and act as their character. They let the character fully become them and put their thoughts aside. This technique is so realistic it’s best suited for film, but it is also great in theater.

The method emphasizes a deep, personal connection to the character and has been employed by a roster of renowned actors, including Marlon Brando and Robert De Niro. 

This technique is known for producing powerful, emotionally charged performances. However, like any technique, it has its strengths and drawbacks. In the following discussion, we will explore these in more detail.

Pros and Cons of Method Acting

A significant advantage is the depth of character it allows actors to achieve, creating authentic, believable performances. As an immersive technique, it encourages actors to pull from personal experiences, leading to nuanced portrayals that resonate with audiences.

However, method acting has its drawbacks. The intense emotional exploration can blur the line between reality and fiction, potentially causing psychological distress.

Furthermore, method acting can be time-consuming and require extensive preparation. It may also limit versatility, as actors become too entrenched in a single character.

Thus, while method acting can lead to groundbreaking performances, it requires careful handling to avoid pitfalls.

Famous Method Actors

Many professional actors swear by the legacy of Stanislavsky’s system. Here are a few:

1. Daniel Day-Lewis: Known for his extreme dedication to his roles, Day-Lewis often stays in character even when the cameras stop rolling. He won three Oscars for Best Actor for his performances in films like “My Left Foot,” “There Will Be Blood,” and “Lincoln.”
2. Marlon Brando: Often credited with bringing method acting to the mainstream, Brando is known for his intense and realistic performances in films like “A Streetcar Named Desire” and “The Godfather.”
3. Robert De Niro: De Niro is known for going to great lengths to prepare for his roles, such as gaining 60 pounds for his role in “Raging Bull.”
4. Christian Bale: Bale is known for physically transforming himself for his roles, such as losing significant weight for “The Machinist” and bulking up for “Batman Begins.”
5. Heath Ledger: Ledger immersed himself in his role as the Joker in “The Dark Knight,” which many believe contributed to his tragic death.
6. Joaquin Phoenix: Phoenix is known for his intense and immersive performances, such as his role in “Joker,” for which he won an Oscar.
7. Meryl Streep: Known for her versatility and perfectionism, Streep often spends months preparing for her roles.
8. Al Pacino: Pacino is known for his intense and fiery performances, such as his roles in “The Godfather” and “Scarface.”
9. Jared Leto: Leto is also known for Method acting and physically transforming himself for roles, such as losing weight for “Dallas Buyers Club” and gaining weight for “Chapter 27.”
10. Dustin Hoffman: Known for his commitment to his roles, Hoffman often stays in character even when not filming.

Here are some video examples of professional method actors working or discussing their approach:

The Meisner Technique Explained

Acting is living truthfully under imaginary circumstances

– Sanford Meisner

The Meisner Technique, developed in the early 20th century by Sanford Meisner, an American actor and acting coach, is a powerful approach to training actors.

The Meisner acting method encourages actors to respond instinctively to the surrounding environment and stimuli rather than merely delivering pre-learned lines.

Meisner, a member of the Group Theatre, developed this technique as a reaction to his dissatisfaction with the prevalent acting methods of his time.

The technique’s foundation lies in ‘living truthfully under imaginary circumstances.’ 

It encourages repetition exercises to instill spontaneity in actors.

Over time, it evolved to incorporate a more comprehensive approach, focusing on emotional preparation.

Impulse and spontaneity

Meisner’s techniques rely on impulse and spontaneity rather than delving too deeply into a character emotionally. They rely on acting instinctively rather than just playing the character. 

It’s not about memorizing the script but deeply understanding your character, their hopes, dreams, and passions so that you can act like them on impulse.

There is preparation for this technique, but it focuses on a natural way of thinking and not overthinking. This manner relies on external cues.

Meisner’s split from The Group Theatre

The Group Theatre, formed by Lee Strasberg, had another member, Sanford Meisner, who helped create it.

To be an interesting actor, you must be authentic. For you to ever be authentic, you must embrace who you really are.

– Sanford Meisner

Meisner, along with the other theater practitioners of the company, were very much involved in Stanislavsky’s approach to acting, such as the method. The group brought great prominence to method acting. 

However, as time passed, Meisner withdrew and developed his method in new ways, known as the Meisner Technique. He wanted actors to portray more truthful acting.

Meisner believed that actors could not perform authentically without embracing themselves. He often told his students, “To be an interesting actor, you must be authentic. For you to ever be authentic, you must embrace who you really are.”

This method can be seen as rather “easy” compared to Method Acting because it is easy to do once mastered. It takes getting out of your head and being you.

The Meisner Preparation Process

However, this method has three preparation steps: Emotional Preparation, Repetition, and Improvisation. 

Emotional Preparation: this allows the actor to get to know their character as much as possible, such as the backstory, and creating your backstory for the character, your own choices about the character. This all takes place before the scene begins. 

Once the scene begins, everything must be spontaneous and happen on the spot. It’s meant to be reactive in the present moment, and each performance may be different from the last with this technique.

Repetition: This is in the form of a word game. The actor will say a phrase or word repeatedly. This can be done alone or with a partner. The key is to say, “I love this shirt repeatedly,” but say it slightly differently each time. This repetition exercise allows changes in tone and gives a different meaning each time.

Improvisation: Meisner’s technique is based on reaction and instinct. So, all acting is mainly improv while staying in tune with who you portray. This allows spontaneity without relying on the prescribed lines.

Pros and cons of the Meisner Technique

The pros of Meisner acting is a great tool for building your confidence in acting. This allows you to improve your craft. Be bold, be spontaneous, develop a deeper connection to yourself, and understand your abilities. 

This also helps them build an emotional connection with other cast members. 

The cons are having the impulse to do whatever you want in a scene, especially on stage.

The director could envision you acting a certain way, but you do a different physical action. 

It can affect how the director wants it to work or your positioning and lighting on stage.

Another con is that it’s hard to redo a performance exactly how you’ve done it before since it’s based on impulse.

The pros and cons of the Meisner acting technique can be summed up like this:

Pros:

1. Emotional Authenticity: The Meisner Technique encourages actors to respond instinctively and truthfully to their surroundings and scene partners, often leading to a more authentic and believable performance.
2. Greater Presence: The Technique emphasizes the importance of “being” in the moment and reacting honestly to the situation. This helps actors to be more present and engaged in their performances.
3. Improved Listening Skills: The Meisner Technique can greatly enhance an actor’s listening and observation skills, which are crucial for any performer. The method teaches actors to react to their scene partners in a spontaneous way grounded in the reality of the moment.
4. Versatility: The technique can be applied to various acting styles and genres, making it a versatile tool for actors.

Cons:

1. Emotional Strain: The Meisner Technique demands high emotional honesty and vulnerability, which can be emotionally draining for some actors.
2. Time-Consuming: The technique requires a lot of practice and time to master. It can sometimes take years of training to grasp and effectively utilize fully.
3. Not for Everyone: The technique’s emphasis on emotional honesty and instinctive response might not suit all actors, especially those who prefer a more intellectual or methodical approach to acting.
4. Lack of Script Analysis: Critics of the Meisner Technique also argue that it does not emphasize script analysis and character development, which are crucial aspects of acting.
5. Over-reliance on Emotions: Some critics argue that the technique can lead to too emotional or overly dramatic performances. They suggest that a balanced approach that combines emotional truth with a thoughtful script interpretation may be more effective.

Despite its drawbacks, the Meisner Technique can be transformative for actors seeking to deliver innovative performances.

It offers a unique approach to character development, pushing actors beyond their comfort zones and allowing for more authentic engagements on stage and screen.

Famous Actors using Meisner’s acting technique

Several acclaimed actors have effectively utilized the Meisner Technique in their performances, demonstrating its transformative potential in acting.

Here are some examples of famous actors who follow the Meisner school of thought:

1. Robert Duvall: An accomplished actor utilizing the Meisner technique, Robert Duvall’s performance in “The Godfather” is a notable example of his application of this method.
2. Steve McQueen: Known for his cool, understated style, Steve McQueen used the Meisner technique to great effect in films like “Bullitt.”
3. Diane Keaton: Her performance in “Annie Hall” is a remarkable example of the Meisner technique, mixing naturalism with a unique personal style.
4. Gregory Peck: In films like “To Kill a Mockingbird,” Gregory Peck used the Meisner technique to create deeply empathetic characters.
5. James Gandolfini: His portrayal of Tony Soprano in “The Sopranos” is a masterclass in the Meisner technique, showcasing his ability to react truthfully under imaginary circumstances.
6. Sydney Pollack: An actor and director, Sydney Pollack applied the Meisner technique in his performances, such as his role in “Tootsie.”
7. Jon Voight: Jon Voight used the Meisner technique throughout his career, notably in his performance in “Midnight Cowboy.”
8. Sandra Bullock: Bullock’s performance in “Gravity” showcases her ability to react truthfully in imaginary circumstances, a key principle of the Meisner technique.
9. Tina Fey: Known for her comedic roles, Tina Fey uses the Meisner technique to bring authenticity to her performances, such as in “30 Rock.”
10. David Mamet: A renowned playwright and director, Mamet has also acted in several of his films using the Meisner technique, such as “State and Main.”

The success of these actors underscores the Meisner Technique’s potential to enhance acting prowess, shaping performances that resonate with audiences and critics alike.

Here are some video examples of professional actors in action showcasing or discussing the Meisner technique:

Similarities and differences between Method Acting and The Meisner Technique

Delineating the distinctions and parallels between Method Acting and the Meisner Technique provides a deeper insight into these influential acting methodologies. 

Both techniques aim to create truthful, organic performances, emphasizing actors’ emotional authenticity.

They encourage actors to submerge themselves into characters, producing involuntary and instinctive reactions.

However, the methods they use to achieve this goal differ significantly. 

Method Acting encourages actors to draw upon their experiences to inform their performances. It emphasis on emotional memory requires actors to relive traumatic or significant past experiences, which can be emotionally taxing.

Contrarily, the Meisner Technique focuses on the actor’s relationship with others on stage. The technique emphasizes moment-to-moment reactions and impulses, enabling actors to respond instinctively to their scene partners.

The Meisner Technique discourages personal memories, favoring the creation of a character’s emotional life from the fictional circumstances.

Here’s a video from The Meisner Technique Studio explaining the differences in more detail:

Other related acting techniques

The exploration of acting methodologies would be incomplete without considering other related techniques, such as Michael Chekhov’s Technique and Stella Adler’s Technique.

These methods offer unique perspectives and approaches that add depth and innovation to the field of performance art.

Michael Chekhov’s Technique, on the other hand, focuses on a ‘psycho-physical approach.’

This method encourages actors to use their imagination, feelings, and atmosphere to tap into universal and archetypal images. It emphasizes transformation, impulse, imagination, and gesture and allows actors to access deeper parts of their unconscious. 

Chekhov’s Technique offers practical tools for working with imagination and feelings.

It has been utilized by renowned actors like Jack Nicholson and Clint Eastwood. It goes beyond daily life experiences for character development.

I recommend you check out Essential Acting Techniques Every Actor Should Know, which provides a crash course for new actors into the various acting techniques from the Method to Uta Hagen and Checkov.

Meisner vs Method Acting. Which acting technique is the best for you?

Which acting technique is best depends on your style, preferences, and goals as an actor.

If you’re an actor who enjoys deep emotional exploration and is comfortable mining your own experiences for your work, Method Acting might be a good fit for you.

But if you’re more focused on interaction and spontaneity, you might prefer the Meisner Technique.

Ultimately, the best acting technique for you is the one that helps you give the most truthful, compelling performances.

Many actors study multiple techniques and take elements from each to create their approach. 

Experimenting with different techniques and seeing what works best for you can be beneficial.

Final Thoughts

Choosing the best acting technique largely depends on one’s acting style, personal preferences, and the demands of the specific role one portrays. There is no finite answer, as each method offers unique insights and tools for an actor’s creative arsenal.

Method Acting encourages actors to draw life experiences to connect with their characters. This introspective technique can result in intensely authentic performances. However, it may not suit everyone, particularly those uncomfortable delving into personal emotions.

Conversely, the Meisner Technique focuses on external reactions and interactions. It emphasizes ‘living truthfully under imaginary circumstances,’ fostering spontaneous responses. This technique enhances an actor’s ability to listen and respond naturally.

The Method is excellent if you want to explore your character deeply, although you must commit to it, which may take dedication and time to master.

On the other hand, the Meisner is a great way to add your authentic self to the character and is easier to do. Meisner’s acting allows the actors to focus more on themselves and their scene partners. It relies less on the script but instead forms the trust and chemistry between the actors. 

The key is to explore both options and see what works for you. Combine them or not, let your skills and judgment as an actor guide you.

Ultimately, the best technique is subjective and may vary from role to role. Some actors may find method acting more effective for dramatic roles, while others may prefer the Meisner technique for roles requiring quick, spontaneous responses. 

An actor’s quest for the ideal technique is a journey of self-discovery and artistic evolution, making each choice a step toward creative innovation. Ultimately, the best technique is the one that enables the actor to deliver the most compelling performance.